patty duke has died…

hey. it’s me. (hey-o, is matchbox twenty’s “long day” in your head now too?? [and did you remember rob thomas rocking the double-hoops?!? which OF COURSE sends me down memory lane right back to david silver’s lady earring…

img_1658 img_2544 img_4962

can it be that david silver was really on trend? or, THE HORROR, ahead of the curve?!?]).

i feel like patty duke- whom this post is actually about- would really appreciate that digression.

(Ryan Miller/Invision/AP)

(Ryan Miller/Invision/AP)

you know what i think she would not appreciate? the guardian‘s obituary. let’s take a look…

(the guardian)

(the guardian)

WHAT IS THAT?! obviously it is going to be the narrative arc of this obituary, a choice that makes me wonder if ronald bergan is a miracle worker super-fan.


and so we are told her career “could be said to have peaked”- which, let’s face it, is pretty much saying it did.

“there were other highs” but, given that they aren’t listed, presumably they were negligible.


an opening salvo that makes the third paragraph highly confusing.

(the guardian)

(the guardian)

she peaked… and remained there? or was it a slow descent?


it’s “grossly unfair to say that it was downhill all the way for Duke from then on.”

if it’s unfair to say that, then precisely what is being said here?

would it be moderately unfair to say that it was downhill part of the way for awhile? reasonable to say that it wasn’t just lolling about the summit?

riddle me this: what would it be fair to say here? instead of the ambiguous thing being said here.

i honestly have no idea.

(btw, isn’t the patty duke show something of a broadcasting landmark for women on TV? there’s been lucy and… who else? that girl is 1966. [and it wasn’t the marlo thomas show.] the mary tyler moore show isn’t till 1970. ok. you’ve got lucy, judy garland, and donna reed all on in 1963, but DAMN, that is good company for a 16-year-old to be in, non?)



and lo, we pivot to the capsule biography part of the obit.

the capsule biography is the part of the obituary which, i assume, was pre-composed in an editorial practice i DEPLORE… there’s family, childhood, marriages, the 60s, the 70s, her undiagnosed bipolar, the 2000s. we go absolutely FLYING over these, which means valley of the dolls is two sentences.

Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 3.27.24 PM

(the guardian)

votd 1

and, of course, the fact that she had a fairly epic tabloid life in the early 1970s…

October 1970

October 1970

June 1971

June 1971

wherein she incurred the wrath of ms. lucille ball…

08b52a147b49e0f351156ce2d6f290a5img_2334sept 7002e51e8210313c0d8a89a3a0c2fcf03f

is never mentioned.


i’ve written about obituaries before. about how the way we write them is wrong and about how the stories of women are particularly affected by this.

i saw patty duke speak a few years ago, at a valley of the dolls sing-along in chicago. she was charming and lovely and gentle and generally game. the disconnect between her joie de vivre there and the stale description of her here saddens me.

there is one quote from patty duke in patty duke’s obituary. it’s half a sentence (in contrast to the COMPLETE STANZA from the patty duke show theme song) but it’s a good one.

(the guardian)

(the guardian)

it made me want more.

One thought on “patty duke has died…

  1. Pingback: the NYT obituary of florence henderson, working woman | finding jackie

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.